Sociology

What is Sociology?

According to the University of Carolina's College of Arts and Sciences, sociology is the study of human social institutions and relationships. It encompasses a diverse range of subjects, including crime, religion, family, state, race, social class, culture, social stability, and societal change. The objective of sociology is to understand how cultural and social structures shape human behavior and consciousness.

Classical sociological theory posits that the self is a set of relatively stable perceptions of one's identity in relation to oneself, others, and social systems. This perception is socially constructed through interactions with others. Although individuals play an active role in the process of socialization, they are not passive participants and have a significant impact on the development and consequences of this process.

Influence of Social & Cultural Systems on Sense of Self

This explores how social and cultural processes affect the way we see ourselves and our personal identities are built. Although the number of contributing factors is almost endless, there are some of the most important factors that we'll discuss.

As we begin to construct our identities in early childhood, family plays a crucial role in our development. We are a child to our parents and a brother or sister to our siblings. This position within the family network influences how we define ourselves to the people around us.

Our age also contributes to these relationships and our identity. Young children are more dependent on their elders while older children show more independence and may serve as caretakers to younger siblings. As we age, our identities and position in the family network change. Children become adult children of their parents; they may have their own children and spouse and gain nieces and nephews.

Gender also influences these relationships. Remember, sex is a biological term for a person's genetic condition of being male or female. Gender, conversely, is a social construction that differs across cultures. While there are only two sexes, cultures can construct any number of gender categories. Gender is basically how a person expresses their biological sex according to cultural definitions.

George Mead and the Social Self

George Herbert Mead (1863 to 1931) was born in South Hadley, Massachusetts to a successfully middle-class and intellectual family. His father, Hiram, was a pastor and a chair of theology at Oberlin College and his mother, Elizabeth, served as president of Mount Holyoke College for several years. Mead himself enrolled in Oberlin College in 1879 and received his bachelor's degree in 1883. After graduating, Mead briefly taught grade school and worked as a surveyor for a railroad company before enrolling at Harvard in 1887 to continue his education. At Harvard, Mead studied philosophy and psychology with the renowned pragmatist philosopher, William James, who would greatly influence Mead's thought. After receiving a second bachelor's degree from Harvard, Mead went to Germany to study psychology under the famous psychologist Wilhelm Wundt, who also greatly influenced Mead's later ideas about symbolic gestures, society, and the self.

Mead's research focuses on the development of the self. His theory of the social self suggests that the self is formed through social interactions, such as observing and engaging with others, responding to external opinions about oneself, and internalizing feelings about oneself. This social aspect of the self is significant because other sociologists and psychologists during Mead's era believed that the self was determined by biological factors and innate characteristics. In contrast, Mead believed that the self is not innate but develops gradually through social experiences and activities.

For Mead, what we call our sense of self stems from the human ability to be self-conscious, to take ourselves as objects of experience. A sense of self, he argues, only arises as we begin taking the perspectives of others toward ourselves, internalizing them as our own perspective and viewpoint on “who I am.” The self, then, is an emergent product of social experience. Only by being able to take others' perspectives can we gain a viewpoint from outside of our own egos from which to think about and evaluate our personal identities.

The Development of Self

George Mead's theory of the development of self suggests that the self is a social product, shaped and influenced by social interactions and experiences. According to Mead, the development of self occurs in three stages.

The first stage is the preparatory stage, which occurs in childhood. In this stage, children learn to imitate and mimic the behavior of those around them. They do not yet understand the meaning of their actions, but instead, they learn to repeat actions they see others perform.

The second stage is the play stage, which occurs in early childhood. In this stage, children begin to take on roles of specific people, such as a doctor or teacher, in their play activities. This role-taking enables children to see themselves from the perspective of others, thus beginning to develop a sense of self-awareness.

The third stage is the game stage, which occurs in later childhood. In this stage, children learn to take on multiple roles at once, such as in team sports. This stage is crucial in the development of self because it enables children to understand the rules and expectations of a particular social group, and to understand how their own behavior affects others.

Mead's theory suggests that the self is not innate, but rather, it is developed through social interactions and experiences, and that self-awareness is crucial to the development of a sense of self.

The I-Self and the Me-Self

George Herbert Mead, an American sociologist, developed a significant sociological approach to understanding the self. Mead believed that the mind is shaped by the social process and that this process involves two aspects, the "I" and the "me." The "me" represents the social self, while the "I" is the individual's response to the "me."

The "I" is the subject self, while the "me" is the object self. Mead argued that community existence precedes individual consciousness, and individuals must participate in different social positions within society before they can become self-conscious by taking the perspective of others.

Mead also identified different types of socialization, including primary socialization, which occurs when a child learns the attitudes, values, and actions appropriate to individuals as members of a particular culture. Secondary socialization involves learning the appropriate behavior as a member of a smaller group within the larger society. Group socialization suggests that an individual's personality and behavior in adulthood are influenced more by peer groups than by parental figures.

Finally, organizational socialization is the process of acquiring the knowledge and skills necessary to assume an employee's organizational role. This process is characterized by Mead as the "I" and the "me.

Table summary: The distinction between the me-self and the I-self. The me-self is defined as the social self, the known, and the self as an object, consisting of the organized set of attitudes of others and the understanding of the generalized other to regulate behavior. In contrast, the I-self is the knower, the self as subject, and the individual's impulses, acting as the response to the me-self and the attitudes of the community as experienced by the individual.

According to Mead, the mind is the result of the interplay between the "I" and the "me". This process is not just limited to individual selfhood, but forms the basis for human cognition. Mead's theory posits that thinking is essentially an internal dialogue between the "I" and the "me".

The individual's experience of themselves is shaped by the generalized other, or the collective individual of their social group. Our understanding of ourselves is not confined

The Self in Sociological View

In sociological view, the self is an individual's identity and sense of who they are, shaped by social interactions and cultural norms within their society. It is not a fixed or innate characteristic, but rather a dynamic and ever-changing aspect of one's personality that is influenced by various social factors.

Ask Yourself!

How do the concepts of "I" and "Me" interact in the development of an individual's self-identity, and what role do social interactions and the "generalized other" play in shaping this process, according to Mead's theory of the self?

What does research tell us?

One research article that discusses the relationship between sociology and self-discovery is “Sociology and the Self: Rethinking the Relationship” by Sarah J. McNicol and Christina Hughes. This article explores the ways in which sociology can contribute to our understanding of the self, and how the self can in turn inform sociological analysis. It argues that sociology has traditionally neglected the role of the self in shaping social action and social change, and that a renewed focus on the self can enrich our understanding of social phenomena. The authors draw on a range of theoretical perspectives, including symbolic interactionism and social constructionism, to develop a new framework for thinking about the relationship between sociology and the self. The article is published in the journal Sociology, volume 50, no. 1 (2016).

Lesson 3 — Psychology

The Self as a Cognitive Construction

Cognitive development is the construction of thought processes, including memory, problem-solving and decision-making, from infancy through adolescence to adulthood.

Originally it was assumed that children lacked the ability to think or form abstract ideas and remained unrecognized until language was mastered. It is now recognized that babies are conscious of their surroundings and are involved in exploration from the moment they are born. From birth, children begin to learn actively. They collect, sort and process information from around them, using the data to develop skills in perception and thinking.

Cognitive development refers to how a person, through the interaction of genetic and learned influences, perceives, thinks and develops understanding of their environment. Information processing, knowledge, reasoning, language development, and memory are among the areas of cognitive development.

Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development

Jean Piaget, a French psychologist, developed the most prominent and influential theory of cognitive development. Piaget's theory, which was first published in 1952, was a product of his extensive observation of children, including his own, in their natural environments, rather than in laboratory experiments used by behaviorists. Unlike the learning theory, which posits a passive role for children, Piaget believed that they played a more active role in their cognitive development. He saw a child's knowledge as consisting of schemas, which are basic units of knowledge that organize past experiences and serve as a foundation for understanding new ones (Encyclopedia of Children's Health, n.d.).

Important Concepts

Cherry, K. (2020) in her article entitled The 4 Stages of Cognitive Development: Background and Key Concepts of Piaget's Theory said that to better understand some of the things that happen during cognitive development, it is important first to examine a few of the important ideas and concepts introduced by Piaget.

Piaget proposed that children's learning and development are influenced by several factors, including schemas. A schema refers to the mental and physical actions involved in understanding and acquiring knowledge. Schemas are essentially categories of knowledge that help individuals interpret and make sense of the world around them.

Piaget's theory suggests that a schema comprises both a knowledge category and the process of acquiring that knowledge. When individuals encounter new experiences or information, they use this new knowledge to modify, expand, or alter their existing schemas. For instance, a child may have a schema about dogs based on their prior experiences with small dogs.

They may believe that all dogs are small, furry, and have four legs. However, if the child encounters a large dog, they will take in this new information and adjust their schema to incorporate this new observation.

Assimilation is the process of integrating new information into our existing schemas, where we tend to adjust and modify new experiences to fit our preexisting beliefs. For instance, seeing a dog and classifying it as "dog" is an example of assimilating the animal into the child's dog schema.

Accommodation, on the other hand, involves altering our existing schemas or creating new schemas in response to new information or experiences. This process entails modifying or changing our ideas based on new knowledge acquired.

Piaget believed that children strive to find a balance between assimilation and accommodation, known as equilibration, as they progress through the cognitive development stages. Maintaining a balance between applying past knowledge (assimilation) and changing behavior to account for new knowledge (accommodation) is crucial for children's cognitive growth. Equilibration explains how children move from one stage of thought to the next.

Stages of Cognitive Development

Piaget's theory proposes that cognitive development occurs through a series of four universal stages that always follow the same order, each building on what was learned in the previous stage. The stages are the sensorimotor stage (infancy), the pre-operational stage (toddlerhood and early childhood), the concrete operational stage (elementary and early adolescence), and the formal operational stage (adolescence and adulthood).

In the sensorimotor stage, knowledge of the world is limited, but developing, and intelligence is demonstrated through motor activity without the use of symbols.

In the pre-operational stage, thinking is done in a non-logical, non-reversible manner, and egocentric thinking predominates.

In the concrete operational stage, intelligence is demonstrated through logical and systematic manipulation of symbols related to concrete objects, and egocentric thought diminishes.

Finally, in the formal operational stage, intelligence is demonstrated through the logical use of symbols related to abstract concepts, although many people do not reach this stage.

Ask Yourself!

How does the integration of cognitive development theory and self-discovery contribute to our understanding of how individuals construct their sense of self and how it evolves throughout the lifespan?

William James

In his 1890 publication Principles of Psychology, William James, a well-known American psychologist, formulated a theory of self-awareness. James dissected the components of the Self, dividing it into "I" and "Me" and elucidating the distinctions and significance of each (Psychology of Personality Period 8, n.d.).

The Theory of Self

William James divided the "Me" part of the self into three types: material self, social self, and spiritual self.

The material self refers to the aspects of oneself related to physical possessions, such as one's body, clothes, and belongings. It includes everything that a person can call their own, such as their house, car, or money. The material self is also the source of a person's self-esteem, as people tend to evaluate their worth based on their possessions and physical attributes.

The social self refers to the aspects of oneself that are influenced by the social environment, such as one's reputation, social roles, and relationships. The social self is shaped by the opinions and expectations of others, and it includes the various identities and roles that a person plays in society, such as being a parent, student, or employee.

The spiritual self, according to James, is the most important part of the self. It refers to a person's innermost being, their thoughts, feelings, and experiences that define who they are as a unique individual. The spiritual self is not easily observable, and it is not influenced by external factors such as possessions or social roles.

Instead, it is a person's most private and intimate self, the part of them that is most difficult to describe or understand. Component is important because it highlights a person's position in society. This is an aspect of the self-image that is often underestimated. However, a person's role in society can often work to shift their self-esteem in either way.

Table summary: A categorization of human inclinations divided by orientation and focus. Self-Seeking behaviors include bodily appetites and acquisitiveness in the material realm, the desire to be noticed or admired in the social realm, and intellectual or religious aspiration in the spiritual realm. Self-Estimation focuses on personal vanity and wealth in the material realm, social pride and snobbery in the social realm, and senses of moral superiority, purity, or guilt in the spiritual realm.

Table summary: A comparison between Global Self and Differentiated Self, though no data is provided for either category.

Global versus Differentiated Self

The Solid Self versus Pseudo Self

According to The Angry, below are the characteristics of the solid and psuo sell.

Table summary: The distinction between a Solid Self and a Pseudo Self centers on how individuals define their identity and relate to others. A Solid Self is defined by knowing one's own needs and desires, maintaining individuality without merging, and holding personal convictions that are not products of emotional pressure. In contrast, a Pseudo Self is a false version of the individual that reacts to others, fuses with others in relationships leading to a loss of self, and is a product of emotional pressure. Living in a Pseudo Self acts as a disguise that seeks approval and validation from others to provide a sense of security.

Table summary: The True Self is represented by our real feelings and desires, while the False Self is a side of us that has repressed feelings and pushed needs aside to survive. The False Self is described as outer layers of an onion that protect the True Self at the center.

Developmental psychologists such as John Bowlby and D.W. Winnicott propose that children are highly sensitive to their parents' emotions and needs, recognizing on an unconscious level that they require their parents' approval for survival. As a result, they strive to fulfill their parents' needs to the best of their ability, causing their true self-genuine feelings, needs, desires, and thoughts - to be pushed deeper into the core. Despite these authentic qualities still existing within us, the false self that we create during childhood becomes the dominant force. While it may have been beneficial during our early years, it can become a hindrance as we mature and become more independent.

Some psychologists view the true self as the ideal self, with the false self being unhealthy and negative. Others, however, suggest that there are two kinds of false self: healthy and unhealthy.

A healthy false self enables us to function in society by exhibiting good manners and social graces, even when we don't feel like it. We don't express our deepest feelings and thoughts while at work, for example, because it could result in an invasion of personal boundaries and make us vulnerable to negative reactions from others. This healthy false self is a shield that preserves our true self until we're around individuals we can trust. The healthy false self serves as a form of self-protection that allows us to function while staying loyal to our authentic self.

In contrast, an unhealthy false self has similar origins to the healthy false self but differs significantly in terms of long-term effects on our well-being. The unhealthy false self can lead to narcissistic and addictive behaviors, according to D.W. Winnicott. This false self is the product of forced compliance rather than a genuine desire to adapt to society.

Ideal Self vs Real Self

Table summary: The contrast between the Ideal Self and the Real Self. The Ideal Self is the aspirational version of a person shaped by learning, experiences, societal norms, and personal values. In contrast, the Real Self consists of actual thoughts, feelings, appearance, and behavior, serving as the subjective foundation of a person's self-image.

The Importance Of Alignment

According to Carl Rogers (1959), the fundamental motive of human beings is to self-actualize, which involves reaching one's full potential and achieving the highest level of being. Similar to a flower that grows to its fullest under optimal conditions, people also flourish and attain their potential if they are in a good environment. However, Rogers acknowledged that Next is Forethought. It makes a person anticipate of the consequences. As a human being, consequence is a result of something you've done. Everything has its own karma.

May it be good or bad. In life, we'll learn from our mistakes. And when we do make mistakes, we must be ready for what consequences we may face. We must learn how to accept the bitterness of reality.

The third one is self-reactiveness, which enables one to make choices. I believe that whatever we do may be fate but also, it's within our choices. I wanted to study in a different school but I chose Adamson and I am happy with it because I know it is by God's will. Our choices may sometimes lead to disappointment but if we look on the other side, it may bring something out from us.

Lastly, self-reflectiveness, the ability of a person to reflect on oneself. What we do, may it be good or bad. What we will do and what happened in our lives must always be reflected. We must think of it as a way of learning from life. We must learn and reflect about the things from the past for us to become a better person.

The Self in Psychological View

In psychological view, the self is viewed as an individual's internal representation and experience of their own identity. It encompasses an individual's thoughts, emotions, beliefs, values, and behaviors, and is shaped by a range of factors including genetics, life experiences, and social interactions. The self is often divided into different components, such as the "self-concept" (how an individual perceives himself) and the "self-esteem" (how an individual evaluates his self-worth). Psychological theories of the self also explore the role of cognitive processes, such as perception, memory, and attention, in shaping an individual's self-understanding.

What are some possible consequences of a lack of alignment between a person's ideal self and their actual behavior, and how might these consequences affect different aspects of their life, such as relationships, career, and overall well-being?

Instructions for participants: Nine statements are listed below. Please indicate the extent to which you agree with each of them. You can do this by choosing the appropriate number that reflects your degree of agreement. The numbers mean the following:

1 - Totally disagree

2 - Mostly disagree

3 - Somewhat disagree

4 - Somewhat agree

5 - Mostly agree

6 - Totally agree

Table summary: A self-assessment questionnaire consisting of nine statements regarding social confidence and interpersonal skills, such as feeling self-confident in social situations, being easy to love, and making friends easily. Each statement is paired with a rating scale from 1 to 6.

Additional explanation

S.S.E's was developed from Social Self-Esteem Inventory, that consisted of 30 items. Items were translated into Bosnian, with small changes in their content due to specific features of the Bosnian language. Based on Kaiser-Guttman's criterion, seven components were extracted. However, only the first one could be interpreted meaningfully. Hence, these items (nine of them) were retained and this short and simple scale was created.

Its reliability (more precisely, internal consistency) was alpha = 0.837 . It was tested in a sample of 185 adolescents who attended several private schools in Sarajevo (Bosnia and Herzegovina). In addition, Guttman split-half coefficient was equal to 0.853. Therefore, this is a reliable measure of social self-esteem.

The overall score is calculated by summing up scores on all nine items, because all items are given in a positive direction, without reversely coded ones.

Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale

Description of Measure:

The 10-item scale aims to evaluate an individual's overall self-esteem by assessing their positive and negative emotions towards themselves. It is considered a unidimensional measure, with respondents using a 4-point Likert scale to indicate their level of agreement, ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree.

Scale:

Instructions

Please rate your level of agreement or disagreement with the following statements, which relate to your overall feelings about yourself. Use a 4-point Likert scale format, ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree.

1. On the whole, I am satisfied with myself.

Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree

2. At times I think I am no good at all.

Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree

3. I feel that I have a number of good qualities.

Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree

4. I am able to do things as well as most other people.

Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree

5. I feel I do not have much to be proud of.

Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree

6. I certainly feel useless at times.

Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree

7. I feel that I'm a person of worth, at least on an equal plane with others.

Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree

8. I wish I could have more respect for myself.

Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree

9. All in all, I am inclined to feel that I am a failure.

Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree

10. I take a positive attitude toward myself.

Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Scoring

Items 2, 5, 6, 8, 9 are reverse scored.

Give "Strongly Disagree" 1 point.

"Disagree" 2 points.

"Agree" 3 points, and

"Strongly Agree" 4 points.

Sum scores for all ten items. Keep scores on a continuous scale. Higher scores indicate higher self-esteem.

Self-esteem has been a popular concept in recent years, with many educators, parents, and therapists working to boost it with the expectation that high self-esteem will lead to various positive outcomes. However, measuring the effects of self-esteem is complicated due to several factors. While some people with high self-esteem have realistic positive views of themselves, others are narcissistic, defensive, or conceited. Research shows that high self-esteem is partly a result of good performance rather than the cause of it. Efforts to boost self-esteem among students have not been shown to improve academic performance and may even be counterproductive. Although there is some evidence that job performance is related to self-esteem, the correlation is not consistent, and the direction of causality is uncertain.

People with high self-esteem tend to claim that they are more likable and attractive, have better relationships, and make better impressions on others than people with low self-esteem, but objective measures do not support most of these beliefs. Narcissists may be charming at first, but they often alienate others eventually. High self-esteem makes people more likely to speak up in groups and to criticize the group's approach, but it does not directly lead to leadership. High self-esteem is related to greater happiness, but the causal relationship is unclear. While low self-esteem may contribute to depression, the effect of self-esteem on externalizing behavior and delinquency is inconclusive. The benefits of high self-esteem are mainly related to enhanced initiative and pleasant feelings, and indiscriminate praise might promote narcissism. Instead, praise should be used as a reward for socially desirable behavior and self-improvement.

Instructions: On this page are listed a number of body parts and functions. Please read each item and indicate how you feel about this part or function of your own body using the following scale:

1-Have strong negative feelings

2 = Have moderate negative feelings

3= Have no feeling one way or the other

4= Have moderate positive feelings

5 = Have strong positive feelings

Table summary: Factor loadings for sixteen different physical traits, comparing Female and a third unnamed category, while providing no data for Male. For Females, traits like muscular strength, biceps, and body build load onto UBS, while physical coordination loads onto both UBS and PC. Other Female traits load onto PC, PA, or SA. The third category shows a different distribution, with traits such as appetite, waist, thighs, and body build loading onto WC, and others like nose, lips, ears, and chin loading onto SA.

Table summary: A mapping of physical and personal attributes to specific categories. Attributes such as agility, health, and physical condition are associated with PC in both columns, while others like chest or breasts, appearance of eyes, and sex organs are linked to SA in the second column. Some attributes are tied to a single category, such as width of shoulders, arms, and sex drive, which are all labeled UBS, or legs, which is labeled WC. A note at the end indicates that a factor analysis identified three factors.

A factor analysis indicated that three factors emerged for males and females.

These factors are:

1. Physical Attractiveness (P.A) for males or Sexual Attractiveness (S.A) for females,

2. Upper Body Strength (U.B.S) for males or Weight Concern (W.C) for females and

3. Physical Condition (P.C) for both males and females.

Means for these three factors can be computed for males and females but please note that these means cannot be compared because they are not based on the same items. Also note that two items load on two factors for males. The information under the Factor Loading heading should be deleted before the test is given - the information is provided for experimenters who wish to analyse the three factors separately.

To determine a subject's score for a particular subscale of the Body Esteem Scale, simply add up the individual scores for items on the subscale. For example, for female sexual attractiveness, you would add up the subject's ratings of the items comprising the sexual attractiveness subscale (13 items).

Lesson 5 - The Self in Western and Eastern Thought

The Eastern and Western Thought

The Difference between Western and Eastern Philosophy

Table summary: Western and Eastern philosophies differ fundamentally in their approach to logic, identity, and conflict. Western philosophy emphasizes logic, reasoning, and categorization, breaking ideas into parts to find differences and often using debate to establish a superior opinion. It views individuals as separate and unique entities whose experiences are independent. In contrast, Eastern philosophy views ideas as a whole, seeking similarities and common ground, as exemplified by the Yin and Yang. It treats the concept of the separate self as an illusion, viewing people and the world as interconnected.

2 Major Religious Traditions In Asia - Hinduism And Buddhism - And How They View The Self

Hinduism

, a major religion in South Asian countries such as India and Sri Lanka, has two important concepts that aid in understanding its view of the self: the Brahman and the Atman. The Atman is the individual soul or primary living energy that forms the eternal essence of each living thing. The body houses the Atman until it dies, but the Atman is immortal and eternal. On the other hand, the Brahman is the world soul or cosmic soul, which is the eternal essence of the universe and the ultimate divine reality.

It is the life source of all existence, and not an individual being, but more like the primal ground or reality of all being. The phrase "atman is Brahman" means that the individual soul is the world soul. Reincarnation is a natural extension of this concept, as consciousness is considered a symptom of the soul, which is spirit (Brahman) and different from inert matter. The belief in the soul is not only theoretical but is a worldview expressed by Hindus in all walks of life. The real self (Atman) is distinct from the temporary body, and material designations do not apply to this eternal soul. Consciousness spread throughout the body, is a symptom of the soul.

Buddhism

According to Goshton (2019), Buddhism is a religion that was established more than 2,500 years ago in India by Siddhartha Gautama, also known as"the Buddha." With approximately 470 million adherents, Buddhism is considered one of the world's major religions. Its practice has been most prominent in East and Southeast Asia historically, but it is gaining influence in the West. Buddhism shares many philosophical ideas with other religions.

Notable beliefs in Buddhism include the following:

- Adherents of Buddhism do not recognize a supreme god or deity. Instead, they strive to achieve enlightenment, a state of inner peace and wisdom that, when achieved, results in the experience of nirvana.

- The founder of the religion, Buddha, is regarded as an extraordinary man rather than a god. The term "Buddha" means "enlightened."

- The path to enlightenment is attained through morality, meditation, and wisdom. Meditation is a fundamental practice in Buddhism because it is believed to help awaken truth.

• Buddhism encompasses diverse philosophies and interpretations, making it a tolerant and evolving religion.

- Some scholars do not consider Buddhism an organized religion but rather a "way of life" or "spiritual tradition."

- Buddhism encourages adherents to avoid both self-indulgence and self-denial.

• Understanding The Four Noble Truths, Buddha's most important teachings, is critical to comprehending the religion.

- Buddhists embrace the principles of karma (the law of cause and effect) and reincarnation (the continuous cycle of rebirth).

- Adherents of Buddhism can worship in temples or in their own homes.

- Buddhist monks, or bhikkhus, observe a strict code of conduct that includes celibacy

- While there is no single Buddhist symbol, various images, including the lotus flower, the eight-spoked dharma wheel, the boh-dee tree, and the swastika (a symbol whose name means "well-being" or "good fortune" in Sanskrit), have evolved to represent Buddhist beliefs.

Dharma

Buddha's teachings are known as "dharma." He taught that wisdom, kindness, patience, generosity and compassion were important virtues.

Specifically, all Buddhists live by five moral precepts, which prohibit:

- Killing living things

- Taking what is not given

• Sexual misconduct

- Lying

- Using drugs or alcohol

Afterlife

Buddhists believe death is a natural part of the life cycle. They believe that death simply leads to rebirth.

This belief in reincarnation - that a person's spirit remains close by and seeks out a new body and new life - is a comforting and important principle.

Individualistic versus Collective Self

The initial dimension of cultural values is the contrast between individualism and collectivism. Individualism highlights the personal aims and liberties of the individual, while collectivism prioritizes group goals, the greater good of the collective, and interpersonal connections. Individuals who subscribe to individualism are driven by individual gains and advantages.

They set their personal goals and targets based on their own desires and needs. Individualistic workers are very comfortable working with autonomy and not part of a team.

The collectivist is motivated by group goals. Long-term relationships are very important. Collectivistic persons easily sacrifice individual benefit or praise to recognize and honor the team's success. In fact, being singled out and honored as an individual from the rest of the team may be embarrassing to the collectivistic person.

The generalized geographic clusters of individualism may be found in Anglo countries, Germanic Europe, and Nordic Europe. Geographic clusters for collectivism are often located in Arab countries, Latin America, Confucian Asia, Southern Asia, and Sub-Saharan Africa.

An example of how individualism versus collectivism may play out at a university is related to academic integrity. At a university in the United States where individualism is considered the norm, each individual student is expected and generally required to do their own individual work. Sometimes this is confusing to international students from a collectivistic society who come to a university in the United States. The collectivistic expectation is that if another student with whom you have a personal relationship needs your help, then you provide that help.

A collectivistic student has a mandatory social obligation to help the other student succeed. This higher collectivistic social obligation can be in direct violation of academic integrity in an individualistic academic setting (Futurelearn dot com, n.d.).

: Table summary: A comparison of individualist and collectivist cultures, typically reflecting western and eastern ideals respectively. Individualist traits focus on autonomy and self-promotion, characterized as independent, self-reliant, achievement oriented, competitive, assertive, pleasure seeking, self-assured, direct, and driven by self-interest. In contrast, collectivist traits emphasize social harmony and group cohesion, described as socially interdependent, connected, moderate or traditional, cooperative, obedient, self-sacrificing, sensitive, self-controlled, and equalitarian.

Table summary: Individualistic and collectivistic cultural views differ across four key dimensions. In terms of content, individualistic views focus on an independent self and unique personal attributes, while collectivistic views emphasize an interdependent self and relational identities. Regarding generality, individualistic descriptions are broad and transcend context, whereas collectivistic descriptions are narrower and tied to specific situations. For visibility, individualistic views prioritize inner qualities and the authentic self, while collectivistic views emphasize overt behaviors and public expressions. Finally, in evaluation, there is a tendency toward positive self-description and blowing one's own horn in individualistic cultures, contrasted with a tendency toward modesty, humility, and a balanced view of positive and negative qualities in collectivistic cultures.

Keep in mind that these orientations are relative, not absolute. People raised in individualistic cultures are capable of putting the needs of others ahead of their own, just as those raised in collectivistic cultures sometimes pursue their own self-interests.

Understanding Collectivist Culture: How Culture Can Influence Behavior

Collectivistic Culture Traits

A few common traits of collectivistic cultures include:

Social rules focus on promoting selflessness and putting the community needs ahead of individual needs

Working as a group and supporting others is essential

People are encouraged to do what's best for society

• Families and communities have a central role

• Greater emphasis on common goals over individual pursuits

In collectivistic cultures, people are considered"good" if they are generous, helpful, dependable, and attentive to the needs of others. This contrasts with individualistic cultures that often place a greater emphasis on characteristics such as assertiveness and independence. A few countries that are considered collectivistic include Japan, China, Korea, Taiwan, Venezuela, Guatemala, Indonesia, Ecuador, Argentina, Brazil, and India.

How Collectivist Cultures Differ

Collectivist cultures emphasize the importance of community, while individualistic cultures prioritize the rights and concerns of each person. Unity and selflessness are valued traits in collectivist cultures, while independence and personal identity are highly stressed in individualistic cultures.

These cultural differences can have a profound impact on many aspects of society, such as shopping, dress, education, and business practices. A person's cultural background can shape their worldview and influence their behavior.

For instance, workers from a collectivist culture might prioritize the greater good of the group and sacrifice their personal happiness. Conversely, individuals from an individualistic culture may feel that their own goals and well-being take precedence over the collective. Cultural differences like these can lead to misunderstandings or conflicts in cross-cultural interactions.

Influence in Behavior

Cross-cultural psychologists study how these cultural differences impact various aspects of behavior.

Table summary: Cultural differences shape self-perception, relationship dynamics, and conformity. In individualistic cultures, people define themselves by personal traits, whereas in collectivist cultures, they define themselves through social roles and relationships. Collectivist cultures are characterized by low relational mobility, meaning relationships are stable, long-lasting, and often determined by family or geography rather than personal choice, making the maintenance of interpersonal harmony a high priority. Regarding conformity, experiments show that while American participants tend to choose unique items, such as a rare-colored pen, Japanese participants from a collectivist culture are more likely to select common items to avoid disrupting group harmony and to leave preferred options for others.

Table summary: Cultural differences in social anxiety and support. Collectivistic cultures generally show higher levels of social anxiety and a greater acceptance of socially reticent behaviors than individualistic cultures, though this varies by region. For instance, Latin American countries show lower social anxiety than East Asian countries, possibly due to a higher cultural value on sociability and group harmony. Regarding social support, individuals in collectivist cultures are less likely to discuss stressors with loved ones to avoid negative relational consequences, preferring implicit social support, such as spending time with supportive people without directly addressing the stressor.

The Social Construction of the Self in Western Thought

The Self as Embedded in Relationships and through Spiritual Development in Confucian Thought

Confucian thought posits that the self is intricately intertwined with relationships and spiritual development. Unlike Western philosophies that search for the substance or essence of humanity, Confucianism focuses on personality as a product of upbringing and environment. Therefore, the self is not viewed as an inherent entity, but rather as a social construct that is formed through interactions with others. In fact, the human being is seen as a “social animal” with four beginnings at birth:

- the heart of compassion (Jen)

- the heart of righteousness (Yi)

- the heart of propriety (Li) and

- the heart of wisdom (Chih).

These beginnings do not encapsulate a concept of self but rather represent the potential for the formation of the self through the cultivation of virtuous behavior and relationships. The potential for the virtues of Jen, Yi, Li, and Chih exists within the human heart from the outset, and these virtues are seen as the epitome of moral perfection. The self, therefore, is believed to develop from the cultivation of these virtues through practice.

In Confucianism, personality is not considered a fixed trait, but rather an achieved state of moral excellence. However, unlike Western philosophy, the Confucian concept of self is not primarily viewed as an individual entity, but is deeply embedded within the family and society. The self only becomes what it is within this context.

In Confucianism, the self is in a constant state of development and can never remain static. The pursuit of virtues is essential for the being human, and stopping to develop them means losing them all. The sage, or the morally wise person, has integrated the pursuit of virtues into their nature, making it an unconscious way of being.

Self-discovery can be viewed differently in individualistic and collectivistic cultures

In individualistic cultures, self-discovery is often seen as an important aspect of personal growth and development. Individuals are encouraged to explore their own interests, passions, and goals, and to pursue their own path in life. Self-reflection and introspection are valued, and individuals are often encouraged to express their thoughts and feelings openly. Personal identity is often defined by one's unique qualities and achievements, rather than by one's social roles or relationships.

In contrast, in collectivistic cultures, self-discovery is often viewed as part of a larger process of socialization and integration into the community. Individuals are encouraged to identify with and conform to the values, beliefs, and norms of their social group, and to prioritize the needs of the group over their own individual desires. Personal identity is often defined by one's social roles and relationships, such as being a member of a family, community, or workplace. Self-reflection and introspection may be less valued, and individuals may be expected to keep their thoughts and feelings private in order to maintain social harmony.

Despite these differences, self-discovery can still be an important aspect of personal growth and development in both individualistic and collectivistic cultures. In individualistic cultures, self-discovery may involve exploring one's own unique qualities and values, while in collectivistic cultures, self-discovery may involve understanding how one's individual identity is shaped by and contributes to the larger social group.

What are some key differences in the ways Eastern and Western cultures approach self-understanding and how do these differences impact the way individuals in these cultures view themselves and their place in society?

You have reached the end of the document.